Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Allen v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen
Defendant:
Terry Garrett, David Kadow, Kenda Culpepper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnum v. Grayson County et al
as 4:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Barnum
Defendant:
Grayson County, Tom Watt, Kerrye Ashmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browning v. Cardwell et al
as 4:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
John David Browning
Defendant:
Garland Don Cardwell, J. Kerrye Ashmore and Karla Baugh-Hackett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashmore v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2021cv00845
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Defendant:
Jay Jones, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Ashmore
as 3:2021cv00817
Plaintiff:
Robert C Adams
Defendant:
Joshua Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. White et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Brandon Hutto, Shane Healey, Det. Amerson and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Ashmore
as 3:2021cv03162
Plaintiff:
Robert C Adams
Defendant:
Joshua Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashmore v. Lee County Dentention Center et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00389
Defendant:
Steward Hill, Lt. Jones, Lee County Dentention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Ashmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
