Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Walker v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Larry O'Neal Walker, II
Defendant:
Chief Cantrell, Keith Gregory, Sgt. Andy Howdeshell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TONEY v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
ANGUS J. TONEY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01434
Plaintiff:
John Angus Wright
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, Centurion of Florida, LLC and Medical Care Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Gualtieri et al
as 8:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watkins
Defendant:
Sheriff Bob Gualtieri, Detective Nathan Leathers, Detective Eric S. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angus Brown v. Warden
as 22-55820
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANGUS BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC Lompoc
Thompson v. People of the State of Colorado, The et al
as 1:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Sanza Eugene Thompson
Defendant:
People of the State of Colorado, The and Angus Bone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller #262220 v. Gordan
as 2:2021cv01867
Plaintiff:
Frederick Angus Miller, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Gordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. Livecch #6894 et al
as 2:2021cv01343
Defendant:
P.O. Officer Jonh Angus #6151, Robert A. Macedonia, P.O. Officer Brandon Livecch #6894 and others
Plaintiff:
Devon Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Angus v. Ward et al
as 6:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Georgia State Legislature, J-Pay, Secikus Technologies, Timothy C. Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Angus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TONEY v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Defendant:
TRAVIS DAVIS, ANDREA STROUP, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
ANGUS JAMES TONEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
