Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00054
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Warden Joshua Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 4:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Green et al
as 2:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jones
Defendant:
Kendall Green, Arizona Department of Public Safety and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colston v. Fayette County Jail
as 3:2023cv00089
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Fayette County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colston v. Babb
as 3:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
Bobby Jones Colston
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb and Fayette County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kyles v. Jones et al
as 5:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Omar O'Shea Kyles
Defendant:
Tina E. Patrick, Lubbock County Detention Center, Dixon Services Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. ESSEX COUNTY
as 2:2020cv10333
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv24290
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bird v. Parker et al
as 3:2017cv00206
Plaintiff:
James D Bird, II
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Jason Woodall, Shawn Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Secretary Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv22332
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jones
Defendant:
Secretary Department of Corrections , Attorney General State of Florida and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
