Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Holdiness v. Borello et al
as 3:2024cv00349
Plaintiff: Michael W. Holdiness
Defendant: Mark Borello and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Nguyen v. Borello et al
as 2:2023cv01073
Plaintiff: Ryan Nam Nguyen
Defendant: Daryl Borello, Stuart Young, Ms. Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jama v. Ball et al
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff: Hamza Mohammed Jama
Defendant: (FNU) Ball, Christopher Randall, Heidi Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jones v. Suh et al
as 3:2022cv01961
Plaintiff: Clarence Eugene Jones and Descendant of Black Chattel Slaves
Defendant: Samuel Suh, Chaplain Toth, Dennis Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff: MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Borello v. Scottsdale, City of
as 2:2022cv01492
Plaintiff: Michael Borello
Defendant: Scottsdale, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas v. Young et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01004
Plaintiff: Dameion Douglas
Defendant: Stuart Young, Daryl Borello, Chaplain Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Borello
as 3:2021cv00734
Plaintiff: Willie Lynch
Defendant: Mark Borello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollinquest v. Young et al
as 6:2021cv00894
Plaintiff: Dasay Hollinquest
Defendant: Daryle Borello, Stuart Young and Nathaline Frener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?