Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Goss v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Penni Padgett, Gila, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Brett William Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers et al v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00212
Plaintiff:
Gilbert M Rivera, Gilbert Bejarano, Patrick Coty Chester and others
Defendant:
J Adam Shepherd, Gila, County of, Penni Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Street et al
as 4:2019cv00751
Defendant:
Fred Lawton, III, Malcolm B Street, Jr, Kim McCarson and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seaton v. Nooth
as 2:2014cv00183
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Brett William Seaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gress v. Smith, et al.
as 2:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Michael Gress
Defendant:
Christopher Smith, Stephen Tseng, Brett Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrey v. Lovett et al
as 2:2012cv01457
Plaintiff:
Joey Torrey
Defendant:
Lovett, Lonnie Jackson, Brett Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dwayne Eichler v. J. Tilton, et al
as 11-16374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE EICHLER
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TILTON, WOODFORD, HICKMAN and others
Michael Macahilas v. Richard Galloway, et al
as 11-15709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MACAHILAS
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD P. GALLOWAY, M.D., WILLIAM DOUGLAS, M.D. and BRETT WILLIAMS, M.D.
Steve Martinez v. John Ziomek, et al
as 10-17330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ZIOMEK, DPM, Individual and Official Capacity, M. MARTEL, Warden, Individual and Official Capacity, CHRISTOPHER SMITH, M.D., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Abreu v. Cate et al
as 2:2010cv01621
Plaintiff:
Clifford Abreu
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Richard Subia, Michael Martel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
