Cases 1 - 10 of 1,145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tatum v. Criaye et al
as 3:2024cv01183
Plaintiff:
Bobby Tatum
Defendant:
C/O Criage, Lt. Bradford, Lt Auston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Sellers v. Macdill et al
as 3:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Justin Macdill, Carol Bradford, Chris Carr and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallworth v. Walker County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
Bryan Stallworth
Defendant:
Walker County, Texas, Kevin Dehart, Jennifer Lewman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
Joeseph Townsend
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, James D. Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Fed Ex
as 5:2024cv01984
Plaintiff:
Donald Dante Bradford
Defendant:
Fed Ex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Coka Cola Co
as 4:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Donald Dante Bradford
Defendant:
Coka Cola Co
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Martinez Coke Cola Refinery
as 4:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Donald Dante Bradford
Defendant:
Martinez Coke Cola Refinery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tilghman v. Princess Anne Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Bradford Tilghman
Defendant:
Princess Anne Police Department and Officer Thomas McMenemy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
