Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Neil Matthews v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-7261
Petitioner / Appellant:
NEIL C. MATTHEWS
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and HAROLD W. CLARKE
Green v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lowell Quincy Green and Lowell Dequincy Green
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Matt Johnson, Ken Paxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2021cv00487
Petitioner:
Neil C. Matthews
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farren Bryant v. Debbie Asuncion et al
as 2:2019cv06889
Defendant:
Correctional Officer H. Watson, Warden Debbie Asuncion, Sgt. R. Clemons and others
Plaintiff:
Farren Bryant, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00802
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bryan v. Matthews
as 3:2012cv02316
Plaintiff:
Edward Bryan
Defendant:
Carolyn C Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. City of Mt. Vernon et al
as 1:2012cv01174
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Mt. Vernon, Police Department and City Court, P.O. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. City of Mt. Vernon et al
as 7:2012cv01174
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Matthews
Defendant:
City of Mt. Vernon, P.O. John Doe, DA John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Laubshire et al
as 6:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
M V Laubshire, William R Byars, Jon Ozmint and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorenzo Fosselman v. Randolph Gibbs, et al
as 11-15682
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORENZO FOSSELMAN, AKA Lorenzo Fosselman, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDOLPH GIBBS, M.D., ALLISON BRAGER, C. KATES, LVN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
