Cases 1 - 10 of 1,769
Mozee v. Chandler et al
as 5:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Patrick O Mozee
Defendant:
Nathan Chandler and Jennifer Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Lt. Chandler et al
as 0:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
David Tyran Johnson
Defendant:
Lt. Chandler, Sgt. Calex, SCDC Security Threat Group Intelligence Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Long et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Antion M. Long, Jarred L Phillips, Shamar Singletary and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Baysore
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Tristan Chandler Stevens
Defendant:
Warden Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Whittaker v. USA
as 3:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Denzel Chandler v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6413
Petitioner:
DENZEL JOSHUA CHANDLER
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director
Chandler v. USA
as 2:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Andre Chandler
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Riggin v. Fiorilli et al
as 9:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Chandler Joseph Riggin
Defendant:
Joanna Fiorilli, John Doe #1-5 and Denisha Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. RALPH et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Defendant:
A RALPH and C CASWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
