Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Murphy v. Powell
as 23-4118
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CHARLES MURPHY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ROBERT POWELL
MURPHY v. ROCA et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
JAVAR CHARLES MURPHY
Defendant:
C ROCA, BLASSY, D LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Charles Gillis
as 23-6337
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES MURPHY GILLIS
Murphy v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00097
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Respondent:
Robert Powell and Utah Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Anthony Charles Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ELY v. OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 4:2019cv00273
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROTHERS, OFFICE OF THE JACKSON COUNTY SHERIFF, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Plaintiff:
MELVIN L. ELY, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Duchesne County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2019cv00852
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Murphy
Defendant:
Duchesne County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Neilson et al
as 4:2018cv00060
Defendant:
Brian Neilson and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Petitioner:
Anthony Charles Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Murphy v. Willmore et al
as 1:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Anthony Charles Murphy
Defendant:
Thomas L. Willmore, Spencer Walsh, Barbara Lochmar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABNER v. EVERSON et al
as 4:2016cv00136
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE ABNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, RONALD EVERSON, CHARLES MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOFFATT v. CAROUTHERS et al
as 4:2016cv00133
Defendant:
MICHAEL CAROUTHERS, ANNA MORRIS and CHARLES MURPHY
Plaintiff:
SEAN EVAN MOFFATT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
