Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Carmona v. Maryellen et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Carmona
Defendant:
Sliya Maryellen, Matthew J Pina, Joel V Ferreira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Gould v. State of Conn et al
as 3:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Gould
Respondent:
State of Conn and GA-15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Robert Logan Michael
Defendant:
Pamela Givens, Sandra May, Shirley Hamrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Jamaine J. Jones
Defendant:
Semple and Conn. Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maragh v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Leeroy Maragh
Defendant:
Semple and Conn Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Babich et al
as 3:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Dr Babich, Rachell Dodd, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
