Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Steven L. Harris v. Chantell Jewell
as 24-1999
Petitioner:
STEVEN L. HARRIS
Respondent:
CHANTELL JEWELL
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Jewell et al
as 2:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Samuel N Roberts, Jr
Defendant:
Chantell Jewell, Michael and Carlie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duran (PS) v. Contiguglin et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
Joseph Louis Duran
Respondent:
Chantel Contiguglin, Shin Young, Assistant District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Selak v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02419
Plaintiff:
Destiny Chantell Selak
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County Estrella Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Community Reintegration Center et al
as 2:2023cv01359
Plaintiff:
Michael L Winston
Defendant:
Community Reintegration Center, Chantell Jewell and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wycoff v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Steven Wycoff
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jeff Barteff, Mike Heinricy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BYRD et al
as 2:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARTIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL BYRD, LAUREN CUPP, CHANTELL KNEEP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
