Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Lopez v. Lumpkin
as 7:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Christopher Phillip Lopez
Respondent:
Director TDCJ Bryan Colier and Director TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. Phillips et al
as 8:2023cv02183
Plaintiff:
Craig L. Middleton
Defendant:
Christopher Phillips, Robert Pero, E. Belsujet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Regaldo et al
as 4:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Christopher Phillips and Charles Christopher Wheeler
Defendant:
Vic Regaldo and Chaplin Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. LAMBETH et al
as 3:2021cv00684
Defendant:
C JONES and R LAMBETH
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIP WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. WILEY
as 3:2020cv05788
Defendant:
SANTA ROSA SECURITY, A WILEY, D SHAW and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIP WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv00174
Defendant:
MATTHEW HAGERTY, POLICE OFFICER BENNIS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Taney County Jail et al
as 6:2017cv03368
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Phillips
Defendant:
Taney County Jail, Jim Arnott and Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VAUGHN v. USA
as 3:2016cv00077
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER PHILLIP VAUGHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Marable v. Rutherford County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2016cv01127
Plaintiff:
Julius Marable
Defendant:
Rutherford County Sheriff's Department, 16th Judicial Circuit Court, Murfreesboro Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. USA
as 1:2016cv00129
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Timothy Christopher Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
