Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 277
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff: WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant: DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00224
Plaintiff: Denis Alberto Rivera
Defendant: David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke, Randall C. Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Cureton, Jr. v. John Gray
as 24-6282
Plaintiff: KEITH CURETON, JR.
Defendant: JOHN R. GRAY, MARK FLEMMINGS, MONICA BOND and others
Coley v. Sandhu et al
as 3:2024cv00807
Plaintiff: Kerry Coley
Defendant: Dentist Sandhu, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Vinyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner: Terrance Coley
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coley v. DOC Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner: Blayne Jeffrey Coley
Respondent: DOC Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Anderson et al
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Ra'Quan Robinson
Defendant: Warden David Anderson, A.W. Bateman, C.O. Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 5:2024ct03005
Plaintiff: Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant: Todd E. Ishee, Correctional Officer Gray, Correctional Officer Privis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coley v. MJ King
as 6:2024cv06003
Petitioner: Terry Coley
Respondent: MJ King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Coley v. Cueva et al
as 2:2023cv03019
Plaintiff: Andrew Calvin Coley
Defendant: Daniel E. Cueva and H. Mosely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?