Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Johnson v. Brian Barney, et al
as 24-3287
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. JOHNSON
Defendant:
BRIAN BARNEY, JASON JOSEPH, WILLIAM COOL and others
Coleman v. Tate et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Michael Coleman
Defendant:
Superintendent DiDymus Tate, Superintendet Travis Myers, Correctional Officer Scott Soltysiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STODDARD v. HEILIG et al
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL A STODDARD
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER SCOTT A HEILIG, LT SMITH, MAJOR MCGEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hamilton et al
as 7:2022cv00567
Plaintiff:
Davon Brashir Martin
Defendant:
Lt. Hamilton, Correctional Officer Rondal White, Correctional Officer Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Newman v. Pender Correctional Institution
as 5:2022ct03348
Plaintiff:
Robert Luke Newman
Defendant:
Pender Correctional Institution and Correctional Officer Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory v. Koon et al
as 5:2022cv02743
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Martin Gregory
Defendant:
Jay Koon, Mr Singleton, Captain Currancri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Shipp v. Punturi et al
as 7:2021cv00414
Plaintiff:
Mark Joseph Shipp
Defendant:
Warden K.T. Punturi, Lieutenant Bogle, Captain Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Milsap
as 9:2019cv01025
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Correction Officer Scott Milsap
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
It, Anthony v. Scott
as 3:2019cv00605
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Scott
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kwaame It
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirleaf, Jr v. Correctional Officer Scott
as 3:2018cv00583
Plaintiff:
Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
