Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Austin Lightfeather v. Abby Osborn, et al
as 22-2765
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather, also known as Austin Edward Bower, also known as Austin Edward Gautney
Defendant / Appellee:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
Austin Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln
as 22-2570
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Abby Osborn, Legal Counsel, Mental Health Board, of Lincoln, NE, Prescott Place and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Lincoln
Nettles #271812 v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Macking Nettles #271812, Jr.
Defendant:
Courtney Miller, Rueben Babbitt, Unknown Party #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Green et al
as 8:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Julie, Lauren Gaylord Baired, Brenda Mae Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00336
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Lisa Smith, Sondra L Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Davis, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shepard v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2015cv03165
Defendant:
Ty Lynne Bauers, Shannon Black, Sherri Dawson and others
Plaintiff:
George Shepard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dupree v. Prator et al
as 5:2013cv02443
Plaintiff:
Mark Steven Dupree, II
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Robert Wyche, Rick Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stainbrook v. Houston et al
as 4:2007cv03196
Plaintiff:
Curtis Stainbrook
Defendant:
Robert Houston, Frank Hopkins, Dennis Bakewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
