Cases 1 - 10 of 15
McCoy v. Stirling et al
as 0:2023cv02032
Plaintiff:
David McCoy
Defendant:
Bryant P. Stirling, Sgt. Jenkins, St. Cpl. G. Lission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McCoy v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv02307
Plaintiff:
David McCoy
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Warden Johnny Hedgemon and Johnny Hedgemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERRELL v. USA
as 1:2019cv00939
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DAVID MCCOY FERRELL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCoy v. Harrison
as 5:2017hc02202
Petitioner:
Alexey David McCoy
Respondent:
Donnie Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCoy v. Paris et al
as 5:2017ct03276
Plaintiff:
Alexey David McCoy
Defendant:
Meredith K. Paris, Kathryn Pomeroy, Donnie Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Hall v. Joseph Piazza, et al
as 11-3882
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, Superintendent
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DAVID ANTHONY, VARANO, Deputy Superintendent for Centralized Services, ROBERT MCMILLAN, Deputy Superintendent for Facilities Management and others
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2871
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and others
Andre Jacobs v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 11-2832
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANDRE JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, ALLEN LYNCH, ROBERT BITTNER and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS MCCONNELL, CAROL A. SCIRE and GREGORY GIDDENS
Ronald Bricker v. Atty Gen PA, et al
as 10-4433
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD L. BRICKER
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTY GEN PA, PATRICK S. CAWLEY, Deputy Att. Gen. of Pa., MARY L. FRIEDLINE and others
Bricker v. Corbett et al
as 1:2010cv01608
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Patrick S. Cawley, Mary Lynch Friedline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
