Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BURKE v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURKE
Defendant:
RICK MYERS, HARDIN, DAVISSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, Derek Schmidt, Laura Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Mickels v. Levys-Transport System et al
as 1:2022cv00857
Plaintiff:
Terrell E. Mickles
Defendant:
Levys-Transport System, Urban Communist Regime 5th and 11th Circuits, (1924) French Physicist-Louis De Brogile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MICKLES v. LEVYS-TRANSPORT SYSTEM et al
as 1:2022cv05057
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MICKLES
Defendant:
LEVYS-TRANSPORT SYSTEM, LOUIS DE BROGILE and C.J. DAVISSON - L.H. GERMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis (ID 06598) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03247
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Reno, County of, Derek Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis (ID 06598) v. Schnurr et al
as 5:2021cv03205
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Daniel L. Schnurr, Debra K. Lundry, Jennifer J. Davisson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davisson v. USA
as 2:2021cv00010
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John David Davisson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Weaver v. Davisson
as 2:2017cv00500
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Hilary K. Davisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver v. Davisson
as 2:2015cv01958
Plaintiff:
Willie Weaver
Defendant:
Hilary K. Davisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colabine v. Sacramento County Office of the Public Defender et al
as 2:2015cv00660
Plaintiff:
Thomas Colabine
Defendant:
Sacramento County Office of the Public Defender and Hilary Davisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
