Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(PC) Kumar v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2024cv01772
Defendant:
Randy, J. Saucedo, Xiong and others
Plaintiff:
Sanjay Kumar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Springhetti et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Thompson
Defendant:
Scott Springhetti, Luke McKee, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Babu, et al.
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Esco Jackson
Defendant:
Veer Babu, Padilla, Mc Fetridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jackson v. Babu, et al.
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
James Esco Jackson
Defendant:
Veer Babu, Padilla, Mc Fetridge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDALLA v. DR. DEO et al
as 1:2018cv17077
Defendant:
DR. DEO, DR. R. WOODARD, DR. BILL and others
Plaintiff:
SUHDI ABDALLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calletano Galarza-Morales v. Terry Means, et al
as 16-10476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALLETANO GALARZA-MORALES
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRY R. MEANS, United States District Judge, JEFFREY L. CURETON, United States Magistrate Judge, SHAWN SMITH, Assistant United States Attorney and others
Galarza-Morales v. Means et al
as 4:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Calletano Galarza-Morales
Defendant:
Terry R. Means, Jeffrey L Cureton, Shawn Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine v. Klee et al
as 2:2015cv14329
Plaintiff:
Suffren Antoine
Defendant:
P. Klee, W. Rondeau, L. Evans and others
Diego Nunez v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 14-12072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIEGO O. NUNEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHLEEN CARTER, DEO, Central Florida Reception Center and SOLANO, LTA, Central Florida Reception Center
De Deo v. Brown
as 10-4897
Petitioner - Appellant:
Dominick De Deo
Respondent - Appellee:
W. Brown, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
