Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CUNNINGHAM v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DHS SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mehmood v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv21207
Defendant:
Acosta, DHS Secretary and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHEN v. DHS SECRETARY et al
as 2:2017cv01921
Plaintiff:
DEMIN CHEN
Defendant:
DHS SECRETARY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARK VOGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01618
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gomis v. U.S. State Secret, et al
as 08-1352
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTOINE GOMIS
Respondent - Appellee:
U.S. STATE SECRET, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DHS SECRETARY and others
Gomis v. U.S. State Secret et al
as 1:2008cv02003
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Respondent:
U.S. State Secret, U.S. Attorney General, DHS Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gomis v. US Secretary of State et al
as 5:2008cv03418
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
US Secretary of State, US DHS Secretary, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bravo-Diego v. ICE et al
as 2:2007cv01115
Petitioner:
Juan Bravo-Diego
Respondent:
ICE, INS District Director, DHS Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
