Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Silsattanak v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00185
Plaintiff: Erik Silsattanak
Defendant: The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James Dzurenda, William Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff: DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant: MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Zaken
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: Daniel Jacobs
Defendant: Michael Zaken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs v. Zaken et al
as 4:2023cv01057
Petitioner: Daniel Jacobs
Respondent: Michael Zaken and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 5:2022cv00122
Petitioner: DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent: RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
CRAVEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00220
Petitioner: Daniel Jacob Craven and DANIEL JACOB CRAVEN, JR
Respondent: Secretary Ricky Dixon, Ashley Moody and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HALLENBAKE v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00281
Plaintiff: DANIEL JACOB HALLENBAKE
Defendant: BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Hendricks
as 6:2019cv00379
Petitioner: Adam Daniel Jacobs
Respondent: Kimberly Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Uhl v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2015cv00114
Petitioner: Daniel Jacob Uhl
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Uhl v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 5:2014cv00527
Petitioner: Daniel Jacob Uhl
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?