Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Charles Cook v. Surry County Sheriff's Office
as 24-6194
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, Sheriff, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS, Sheriff and others
COOK v. SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER GOINS and ETHAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURY COUNTY SHERRIFF'S OFFICE, OFFICER GOINS, OFFICER ETHAN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COOK v. SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
as 1:2023cv01046
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVID COOK
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2020cv00629
Defendant:
Wake County Family Courts System, John Smith, Robert Rader and others
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2020cv03074
Defendant:
WAKE COUNTY FAMILY COURTS SYSTEM, JOHN SMITH, ROBERT RADER and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2020cv23619
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
David Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kelly v. Carr et al
as 1:2019cv04972
Defendant:
David Cook, Chris M. Carr and Timothy Ward
Plaintiff:
Courtney Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
David Cook
Defendant:
Alonso Ammsord and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLBERT v. WALKER et al
as 5:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
WILLIE CLAUDE COLBERT
Defendant:
SHERIFF LEWIS WALKER, THOMAS JARRIEL, DETECTIVE JAME HOLLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
