Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Crocker v. Sterling et al
as 4:2024cv02849
Plaintiff:
Phillip H. Crocker, III and Phillip Henry Crocker, III
Defendant:
Bryan Sterling, David Martinez and Curtis Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Smith v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Courtney M. Smith
Defendant:
David Jones, David Martinez, Leroy D. Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solis v. Guess
as 5:2023cv00207
Petitioner:
David Martinez Solis
Respondent:
FNU Guess and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. USA
as 5:2023cv00082
Petitioner:
John David Martinez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Jackson, Jr. v. Stephenson et al
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Feldon J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
George Stephenson, David Martinez, Nancy Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv61894
Plaintiff:
Michael David Martinez
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Esochaghi et al
as 2:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
David Martinez
Defendant:
Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi, E. Tatum, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01327
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubbard v. Stirling et al
as 8:2021cv00684
Defendant:
Clarissa Brown Finley, Bryan Stirling, Marilyn Griffin and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Martinez et al
as 5:2020cv00096
Respondent:
Honorable Ricky B Smith and David Martinez
Petitioner:
Robert Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
