Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Saddler v. Errington
as 22-60512
Petitioner / Appellant:
Johnny Lee Saddler
Respondent / Appellee:
Joe Errington
Stadin v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tyler Stadin
Defendant:
Mark Gober, Breat Errington, Vickey Haney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Hall
as 22-60227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omar Khayyam Humphrey
Defendant / Appellee:
Pelicia Hall, Commissioner of Mississipi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Joe Errington, Superintendent, Joshua Csaszar, Warden and others
Crump v. Errington
as 22-60211
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jermaine Crump
Respondent / Appellee:
Joe Errington
Jackson v. Hall
as 22-60168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
Pelicia Hall, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, In her individual and official capacities, Joe Errington, In his individual and official capacities as Superintendent of South Mississippi Correctional Institution, Centurion of Mississippi and others
Brown v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00282
Plaintiff:
James Devon Brown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ferguson v. Errington et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Defendant:
Joe Errington and South Mississippi Correctional Institution
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Csaszak et al
as 1:2020cv00256
Defendant:
Jane Doe SMCI Administrative, Staff of Administrative SMCI, Unknown Pearce and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lewis
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stratton v. Errington
as 1:2020cv00163
Petitioner:
Timothy W. Stratton
Respondent:
Joe Errington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crump v. Errington et al
as 1:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Joe Errington, Christy Guther, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
