Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40235
Petitioner: Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Lainez Garcia v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Melvin Enrique Lainez Garcia
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Barzola Garcia v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00242
Petitioner: Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barzola Garcia v. Lumpkin Example:
as 4:2022cv02455
Petitioner: Pedro Enrique Barzola Garcia
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2019cv00841
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Enrique Bernal Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LEBRON-GARCIA v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv01997
Petitioner: JOSE ENRIQUE LEBRON-GARCIA
Respondent: JOHN E. WETZEL , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez-Garcia v. USA
as 2:2013cv01286
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Jorge Enrique Ramirez-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Enrique Garcia v. John Ault
as 12-3480
Petitioner - Appellant: Enrique Aboytes Garcia
Respondent - Appellee: John Ault, Warden
Garcia v. Ault
as 4:2009cv00307
Petitioner: Enrique Aboytes Garcia
Respondent: John Ault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrillo-Garcia v. USA
as 2:2008cv00734
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Enrique Carrillo-Garcia
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?