Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Noe v. Krow
as 5:2024cv00311
Defendant:
Warden Ivan Krow
Plaintiff:
Eric Thomas Noe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Defendant:
PAULA DICKSON, TISHA THOMPSON, J.D. BALLANGER and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv08392
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
ERIC THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scionti v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 2:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Eric Thomas Scionti
Defendant:
Jason Saitta, Unknown Parties, Chaplain Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
THOMAS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00788
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, PAIGE WHITE and GINA WHITE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. JOHN et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
JOHN, NIKKI and LINDSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, FEMI, JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. QUARRIER et al
as 1:2023cv01952
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
QUARRIER, KATHLEEN M. SIMONE, NANCY EVETTE SPURGIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeremy Braulick v. Paul Rees, et al
as 23-35331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY JOHN BRAULICK
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL REES, ERIC THOMAS, JODY COZBY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.