Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BATES et al v. DEWINE et al
as 1:2020cv00040
Respondent:
PAUL IRVING, BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, MICHAEL R. PENCE and others
Petitioner:
R. LOTUS JUSTICE, RACHAEL N. PARKS, CLAYTON M. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMANDER AND CHIEF JUSTICE V.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00332
Defendant:
COURT OF MILITARY APPEAL, U.S.A., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMANDER AND CHIEF JUSTICE V.P. and FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holger v. United States of America Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00241
Defendant:
Gary George Colbath, Rich Curtner, American British Accredited Registry Association Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eklund v. USA et al
as 6:2018cv03355
Defendant:
Federal Reserve System, Rich Curtner, Mike Pompeo and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Holger Eklund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
PAUL v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION et al
as 2:2009cv00345
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA TERRE HAUTE DIVISION and FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Whitley v. Presidential State Supreme Cabinet Apprentice et al
as 1:2007cv21955
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Whitley
Defendant:
Presidential State Supreme Cabinet Apprentice and Governor Federal Reserve System Chairman Control Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
