Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shamel Jones v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-2229
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAMEL JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, GEORGE LITTLE, EMPLOYEES OF THE DOC and others
Townsend v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02268
Plaintiff:
Rayshun C. Townsend
Defendant:
Fred Smith, Tim Williams, Fedex Express Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsend v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv10446
Plaintiff:
Rayshun C. Townsend
Defendant:
Fred Smith, Tim Williams, FedEx Express Corporation and others
BUCKSHAW v. PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2018cv00078
Petitioner:
JOHN J. BUCKSHAW
Respondent:
PITTSBURGH LAW DEPARTMENT, PITTBURGH MUNICIPAL COURT, PARKWAY CENTER MALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rogerio Scotton v. USA
as 17-12715
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROGERIO CHAVES SCOTTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
:
FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX CORPORATION and UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.
Scotton v. Federal Express Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv24640
Plaintiff:
Rogerio Chaves Scotton
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation, FedEx Express Inc. and FedEx Corporation Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv02452
Plaintiff:
SHAMIKA SAUNDERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2524
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. USA, et al
as 08-20369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN E JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDEX
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2008cv01585
Plaintiff:
Melvin E Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and FedEx
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
