Cases 1 - 10 of 11,319
Stickney v. Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Stickney
Respondent:
Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
M v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
C M
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia and Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02430
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
CALHOUN v. LYNCH et al
as 2:2024cv03078
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL R. CALHOUN
Defendant:
Julie Lynch, FREDERICK D. BENTON, CORY D. HELFFRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuentes v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Yoandris R. Fuentes
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Alan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
David P. Alan
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden, FCI Elkton, Warden, FCI Loretto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. Hijar
as 24-50427
Petitioner:
Raul Chavez
Respondent:
Sandra Hijar, Warden, FCI La Tuna, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Pate v. Warden FCI
as 24-50428
Petitioner:
Frank Edwin Pate
Respondent:
Warden Federal Correctional Institution La Tuna Camp
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
