Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Fernando v. USA
as 1:2026cv06861
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Geoffrey Fernando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
State Attorney's Office v. Gonzalez-Romero
as 8:2026cv03439
Plaintiff:
State Attorney's Office
Defendant:
Fernando Gonzalez-Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
James Kevin Ball v. Fernando Aenlle-Rocha
as 2:2026cv12383
Defendant:
Fernando Aenlle-Rocha
Plaintiff:
James Kevin Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howey v. Lara et al
as 2:2026cv03707
Defendant:
And 20+other John and Jane Doe Fraudulent /Treasonous Actors, Barbara Bencomo, The Court Clerks of the Supreme Court of New Mexico and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Howey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennefield v. Oliver et al
as 1:2026cv06474
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bennefield
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Jane Barwick, Michele Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennefield v. Oliver et al
as 4:2026cv00327
Plaintiff:
Fernando Bennefield
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Jane Barwick, Michele Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Finch v. McMorkle et al
as 7:2026cv00128
Plaintiff:
Scott Finch
Defendant:
Eddie McMorkle, Juan Tello, Fernando Barrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ-MENDEZ v. WARDEN
as 1:2026cv02223
Petitioner:
FERNANDO LOPEZ-MENDEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Urgilez Sarmiento v. Warden
as 26-2795
Petitioner:
JUAN FERNANDO URGILEZ SARMIENTO
Respondent:
WARDEN, MDC Brooklyn
Fernando Mejia v. Richard Muro, et al
as 26-2989
Plaintiff:
Fernando Tello Mejia
Defendant:
Richard Muro and City of Minneapolis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
