Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Gallardo v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02158
Petitioner:
Joe Gallardo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallardo Granados v. USA
as 3:2024cv01275
Petitioner:
Jose Salome Gallardo Granados
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC)Bronson v. Gallardo et al
as 1:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Duane E. Bronson
Defendant:
Gallardo and Clifton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Gallardo v. McVay et al
as 1:2023cv01616
Petitioner:
Eric Gallardo
Respondent:
Matthew McVay and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallardo v. McVay et al
as 2:2023at01172
Petitioner:
Eric Gallardo
Respondent:
Warden Matthew McVay and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallardo v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Juan Gallardo
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wind v. Hartley, et al
as 23-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREGORY CARL WIND, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PATSY HARTLEY, RUBERT GALLARDO, TIFFANI HULUBEK and others
Cornejo v. Minglana et al
as 4:2023cv05383
Plaintiff:
Efrain Cornejo
Defendant:
Sergeant V. Minglana, T. Clayton, C.H. Santos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vega-Molina v. Baysore
as 3:2023cv00591
Plaintiff:
Magdiel Gallardo Vega-Molina
Defendant:
D. Baysore
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gallardo v. Huskey et al
as 4:2023cv00635
Plaintiff:
Jackie Gallardo
Defendant:
Huskey, Reed, Tilly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
