Prisoner Petitions Cases
William Keith v. Garrett William, et al
as 17-15264
Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM KEITH
Defendant - Appellee: GARRETT WILLIAM, Attorney at Law, AKINTOLA, Doctor, DEWITT, Nurse and others
Williams v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv01471
Plaintiff: Merrick Ian Williams
Defendant: Garrette Williams, C. Hairston, Marcus Elam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith v. William, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01596
Plaintiff: William Keith
Defendant: Garrett William, Akintola, DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Beard et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv01587
Plaintiff: Garrett Williams
Defendant: Jeffrey A. Beard, - and Catherine McVey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. HARLOW et al
as 2:2009cv00985
Petitioner: GARRETT WILLIAMS
Respondent: MICHAEL W. HARLOW, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00035
Petitioner: Michael Garrett Williams
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Quarterman
as 4:2007cv04248
Petitioner: Michael Garrett Williams
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Wilkins et al
as 3:2007cv00063
Plaintiff: John Harris
Defendant: Ronnie Wilkins, Henry Ponton and Garrett Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawton v. Worley et al
as 3:2007cv00029
Plaintiff: Donald E. Lawton
Defendant: James Worley, Loretta House, Portia Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?