Cases 1 - 10 of 38
WIGGINTON v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN WIGGINTON
Defendant:
GEO GROUP, INC., MARK SEVIER, CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES v. FINCH et al
as 1:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
HECTOR FLORES, JR.
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEEPLE v. FINCH et al
as 1:2023cv01997
Plaintiff:
DYLAN TEEPLE
Defendant:
FINCH and HACKMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackman v. Alabama, State of et al
as 6:2023cv01112
Petitioner:
Jamikel Hackman
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Barrentine and Adair
Respondent:
Carmichael and Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hackman v. Walker County Jail et al
as 6:2023cv00945
Plaintiff:
Jamikel Hackman
Defendant:
Walker County Jail, Sheriff Smith, Administrator White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hackman v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2023cv00946
Petitioner:
Jamikel Hackman
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Administrator White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hackman v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv04030
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackman
Defendant:
Rebecca Jones and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MELENDEZ v. LANCASTER COUNTY PAROLE & PROBATION OFFICE et al
as 5:2021cv00516
Defendant:
C. HACKMAN, LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON, COUNTY OF LANCASTER PA and others
Plaintiff:
WILBERTO MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackman v. Johns et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
V, S Johns, Jose Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackman v. Johns et al
as 4:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Mrs. V, Jose Rivera, S Johns and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hackman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
