Cases 1 - 10 of 1,049
Ellis v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Eric Higgins and Lucky 8 TV Productions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Fowler et al
as 4:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Derrick Russell
Defendant:
Lea Ellen Fowler, Ola B Lackey, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Brown et al
as 4:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Timothy Xavier Fields
Defendant:
S Brown, J Miller, E Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Judge v. Allred et al
as 2:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Rashaun Judge
Defendant:
David Kim Allred, Elisabeth Higgins and Allison Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sosa v. Mass. DOC., et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Millsaps v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00322
Plaintiff:
Randy Randall
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Greg Henry and Will Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leodis Randle v. Eric Higgins, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Does, Agents, Dyer, 12th Street Police Officer, Major and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
