Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hughes v. Wolfe
as 3:2021cv00184
Petitioner:
Kendrick Howard Hughes
Respondent:
R.M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Stacey et al v. Baker
as 5:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carl Borg, Charles Raymond, Dennis Emerson and others
Defendant:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hughes v. Mackelburg
as 8:2019cv03390
Petitioner:
Kedrick Howard Hughes
Respondent:
W E Mackelburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hughes v. United States of America
as 1:2018cv24815
Plaintiff:
Kedrick Howard Hughes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kay Paschal v. Leon Lott
as 16-7393
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAY F. PASCHAL
Defendant - Appellee:
LEON LOTT, in his individual and official capacity, STAN SMITH, in his individual and official capacity, HOWARD HUGHES, in his individual and official capacity and others
Paschal v. Lott et al
as 3:2014cv04737
Plaintiff:
Kay F Paschal
Defendant:
Leon Lott , Stan Smith , Howard Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. USA
as 1:2012cv00325
Petitioner:
David Howard Hughes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Danny Simmons v. Kentucky Parole Board, et al
as 10-5624
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY EDWARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD, HELEN HOWARD-HUGHES, Ex-Chairperson, Kentucky Parole Board, CHESTER HAGER and others
Danny Simmons v. Kentucky Parole Board, et al
as 10-5366
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY EDWARD SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD, HELEN HOWARD-HUGHES, Ex-Chairperson, Kentucky Parole Board, CHESTER HAGER and others
Simmons v. Kentucky Parole Board et al
as 3:2009cv00591
Plaintiff:
Danny Edward Simmons
Defendant:
Kentucky Parole Board, Helen Howard-Hughes, Chester Hager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
