Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Hale et al v. Clinton, County of et al
as 1:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Fisher, Dana Hale and William Pruesner
Defendant:
Clinton County, Chad Bashore, Jeffrey Armbrustmacher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Decolines v. Hollenbeck et al
as 9:2020cv01502
Defendant:
DA Hallock, KD St. Mary, BJ LaVoie and others
Plaintiff:
Clive Decolines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstead v. Haynes et al
as 3:2020cv05327
Defendant:
Kendra Wakefield, Annice Mizin, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Wendell M Armstead, Jr, Casey Woodson, Justin T Dull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathy v. Kuzmicz et al
as 4:2019cv05932
Defendant:
R. Kuzmicz, K. Hood, M. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Cathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stribling v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation
as 4:2018cv03479
Plaintiff:
Aaron Lamont Stribling
Defendant:
California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, Ross Haynie, Duane Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Ducart et al
as 3:2017cv07228
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr.
Defendant:
Clark E. Ducart, Robert Losacco, J. Kreindler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Hallock et al
as 3:2017cv07229
Plaintiff:
Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Hallock, J. Hunt, T. A. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Hallock
as 3:2017cv04957
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Norton
Defendant:
L. Hallock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norton v. Hallock
as 2:2017cv01742
Plaintiff:
Jonathan J. Norton
Defendant:
L. Hallock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 3:2017cv03026
Plaintiff:
Justin E Byrd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Catherine Gerski, Warden No 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
