Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Perkins v. Dallam et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Gavin Perkins
Defendant:
Ramsey Dallam, Steve Conrad, Detective Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henriquez v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv80828
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Henriquez, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ric L. Bradshaw, Deputy Haris, Corporal Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Haris v. Sproul
as 3:2022cv02436
Petitioner:
Courtney Lee Haris and Courtney Lee Harris
Defendant:
D. Sproul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hari v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv01240
Plaintiff:
Emily Claire Hari and Michael B Hari
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tariq v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Haris Tariq
Defendant:
State of Washington and Yakima County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emily Hari v. James Stuart, et al
as 22-1742
Plaintiff:
Malik Laughlin and Kenneth Lewis
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emily Claire Hari, formerly known as Michael Hari
Defendant / Appellee:
James Stuart, Sheriff of Anoka County, Jonathon Evans, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County, Lt. S. Larson, Deputy Sheriff of Anoka County and others
Daniel et al v. Neff et al
as 2:2021cv02511
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D: Daniel and Wenona Calloway Daniel
Defendant:
Steven S: Neff, Christopher D: Poole, Deanora J: Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hari v. Tilden et al
as 1:2021cv01038
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Andrew Tilden, . Erhler and others
Plaintiff:
David Hari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Allen v. Haris
as 2:2020cv02396
Plaintiff:
Telly Allen
Defendant:
Harris and Haris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hari v. Smith et al
as 0:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Scott Hull, Rachel Clem, Thomas Huse and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Hari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
