Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Johnson et al v. Allen et al
as 1:2023cv04301
Plaintiff:
Antonio Darnell Johnson, Inmates of Clayton County Jail, Christopher Troy Gather and others
Defendant:
Levon Allen, Clayton County Sheriff's Office and Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Dabadie
as 23-30224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Defendant / Appellee:
Carl Dabadie, Jr., Baton Rouge Police Chief, Harold Williams, Officer, Jeffrey Pittman, Officer and others
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
HAROLD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Lange et al
as 6:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Eddy Lange and Henry Garza
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2021cv00652
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Lepak et al
as 6:2021cv00335
Defendant:
Judge Paul Lepak and DA Henry Garza
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mallow et al
as 6:2021cv00274
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Michael Sousounis, Rodney Wilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Allen v. Chief Judges et al
as 6:2020cv00801
Defendant:
SCOTUS, Federal Courts, Chief Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Harold William Van Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dabadie, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv00578
Defendant:
Ferring Barton, City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, Dana Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melbie v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv00156
Petitioner:
Harold William Melbie, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
