Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Denrick Brown v. David Robinson
as 21-7755
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID A. ROBINSON, Deputy Director, KAREN STAPLETON, Disciplinary Appeal Unit Manager, CHRISTOPHER J. GENSINGER, CCB Manager and others
Pratt v. Bebop et al
as 3:2021cv01262
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Pratt
Defendant:
LT. Bebop, Wexford Health Services Inc., Lance T. Korando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haughie v. U.S. et al
as 8:2021cv00101
Defendant:
W. Hill, Security Guard Patterson, B. Swan-Mace and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BARR v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
as 2:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
BRIAN J. BARR
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abraham v. Brayboy et al
as 6:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
Frenchis Gerald Abraham
Defendant:
Lt Brayboy, Cedric June, Xavier Burroughs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 12-2238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Amicus - Appellee:
N. G. BARTLEY
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 11-1229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Henry Washington v. James Grace, et al
as 10-4434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES L. GRACE, DAVID J. WAKEFIELD, R. M. LAWLER and others
Barr v. Rose et al
as 3:2009cv00408
Plaintiff:
Philip J. Barr
Defendant:
David Rose, Jenine Donate, Michelle Haefel and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Washington v. Grace et al
as 4:2008cv01283
Plaintiff:
Henry Unseld Washington
Defendant:
James L. Grace, David J. Wakefield, R. M. Lawler and others
Amicu:
G C Berger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
