Cases 1 - 10 of 110
BEARD v. TICE
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
DYLAN J. BEARD
Defendant:
ERIC TICE, CHRISTIE WEIGLE and SMART COMMUNICATIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Beard v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2022cv00283
Petitioner:
Michael J. Beard and Michael J. Beard, Sr
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beard v. The People of the State of New York
as 9:2022cv00303
Petitioner:
Micheal J. Beard and Michael J. Beard, Sr
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paris v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02149
Defendant:
Joann K. Benway, Editha M. Stokes, Heather L. Spengler and others
Plaintiff:
John Paris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Florence v. Beards et al
as 1:2019cv01019
Defendant:
C. Burnett, G. Turner, T. Viles and others
Plaintiff:
David Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Florence v. Beards et al
as 2:2019cv01441
Defendant:
C. Burnett, G. Turner, T. Viles and others
Plaintiff:
David Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florence v. Benrostrol et al
as 3:2019cv00446
Defendant:
M. Martin, A. Silva, J. Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
David Florence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Beard v. Day et al
as 1:2018cv00077
Plaintiff:
John J Beard
Defendant:
Keith Day, Queen, Stephen Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Eleby v. Beard et al
as 2:2018cv02032
Defendant:
C.M. Heck, M. Contreas, J. Beard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Eleby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbus Allen, Jr. v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 18-55718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLUMBUS ALLEN, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, CDCR Secretary, M. VOONG, Chief, R. BRIGGS, Appeals Examiner and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
