Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALLAL-RAWHI v. FELIX et al
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
FARHA DALLAL-RAWHI and FARHA, DALLAL-RAWHI DBA DALLAL RAWHI FARHA
Defendant:
PAUL A. FELIX, ANJUM AVA, DONALD LEE BUCKINGHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 1:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Duclos v. Lynch et al
as 2:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
McGhee Tony Duclos
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, J. Gregory, T. Cameron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Curry et al
as 4:2023cv01799
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Shelton
Defendant:
Joseph M Curry, Amanda J. Gregory, Susan Boedeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danny Daniels v. Ingrid Rosenquist, et al
as 22-35679
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY L. DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
INGRID A. ROSENQUIST, SCOTT TWITO, APRIL HUELLE and others
Redd v. Linquist et al
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Willie Antoine Redd
Defendant:
Rhonda Linquist and J. Gregory Tomicich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Rosenquist et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Daniels
Defendant:
Ingrid A Rosenquist, Scott Twito, April Huelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clanton v. Czajkoski et al
as 2:2021cv00198
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Clanton
Defendant:
Corporal Czajkoski, Deputy Elder, Dr. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clanton v. Czajkoski et al
as 2:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Clanton
Defendant:
Corporal Czajkoski, Sgt. Elder, Lt. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
