Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 99
James Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 24-10642
Petitioner: JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent: WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - LOW
Graham v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2024cv00032
Petitioner: James Martin Graham
Respondent: Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CORBIN v. FRENCH et al
as 5:2023cv05080
Plaintiff: IAN BRADLEY CORBIN
Defendant: KYLE FRENCH, ANDREW HOLVECK, JOSEPH STAUFFER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DANIELS et al v. MARLEIHIA HARPER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv03867
Plaintiff: DANEE SLAYTON, KELVIN DANIELS, UMIR IDRIS and others
Defendant: MARLEIHIA HARPER, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICE, NICOLE MACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferris v. Berry
as 4:2023cv00060
Petitioner: James Martin Ferris
Respondent: Warden Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Martin, Jr. v. M. King
as 23-6200
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: WARDEN M. L. KING, MS. BROWN-STROBEE, YVONNE LANE and others
SISSON v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2023cv00021
Plaintiff: IVY R. SISSON
Defendant: KERRY J. FORESTAL, BAKER and JAMES MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Martin Graham v. USA
as 22-13757
Petitioner / Appellant: JAMES MARTIN GRAHAM
Respondent / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(HC) Baca v. Robertson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01481
Petitioner: James Martin Baca, Sr.
Respondent: The People of the State of California and James Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Martin, Jr. v. Andrew Comer
as 22-6933
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES MARTIN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee: ANDREW COMER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?