Prisoner Petitions Cases
Moseley v. Booth et al (INMATE 2) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00729
Plaintiff: Stanley Moseley
Defendant: Joy Booth, Joseph Hicks and Steven Ashley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owaiian Jones v. President of the United State We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-7370
Plaintiff - Appellant: OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA and others
Jones v. President of United States of America et al
as 1:2014cv01012
Plaintiff: Owaiion M. Jones
Defendant: President of United States of America, Commonwealth of Virginia, Supreme Court Of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Termaine Hicks a/k/a Jermaine v. Warden Graterford SCI, et al
as 13-3794
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERMAINE JOSEPH HICKS A/K/A JERMAINE WEEKS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Hicks v. DiGuglielmo, et al
as 10-1659
Plaintiff - Appellant: TERMAINE JOSEPH HICKS, a/k/a JERMAINE WEEKS, Jermaine Weeks
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Joseph Hicks v. Debra Dexter
as 09-56628
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSEPH HICKS
Respondent - Appellee: DEBRA DEXTER, Waden
HICKS v. DiGUGLIEMO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv04255
Petitioner: TERMAINE JOSEPH HICKS
Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIEMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LYNNE ABRAHAM and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Joseph Hicks v. John Marshall We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05108
Petitioner: John Joseph Hicks
Respondent: John Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?