Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Grievance Coordinator
as 7:2019cv00868
Defendant:
Grievance Coordinator
Plaintiff:
Julius Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Smith v. Warden
as 17-7648
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN JULIUS SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, Goodman Correctional Institution
Fuller v. Fuller et al
as 6:2017cv06306
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. FUller et al
as 1:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert FUller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2016cv04008
Petitioner:
John Julius Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Goodman Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Bowersox
as 4:2014cv01922
Petitioner:
Julius Smith
Respondent:
Michael S. Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hester v. St. Louis City et al
as 4:2013cv00893
Plaintiff:
Edison Carl Hester
Defendant:
St. Louis City, St. Louis City Commission, St. Louis Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Perry v. Leonard Edwards, et al
as 13-1919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Perry
Defendant - Appellee:
Leonard Edwards, Individually and Officially, Reginald Moore, Individually and Officially, Sheila Troupe, Individually and Officially and others
Perry v. Edwards et al
as 4:2013cv00292
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perry
Defendant:
Leonard Edwards, Reginald Moore, Sheila Troupe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wagner v. City of Saint Louis Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2012cv01901
Plaintiff:
Benjamin W. Wagner
Defendant:
City of Saint Louis Department of Public Safety, Dale Glass, Leonard Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
