Cases 1 - 10 of 15,487
Jackson v. Cain et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
David Darnell Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner Burl Cain, Management and Training Corporation and Unknown Unknown
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Khalil M Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn et al v. Olaniyan et al
as 1:2024cv04065
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gunn
Defendant:
Olatokunbo Olaniyan, Elizabeth Geddes, Maria Cruz Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jackson v. State of Texas
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson
Defendant:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNTER v. JACKSON et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JASON HUNTER, SR
Defendant:
SHERIFF THEODORE JACKSON and PAUL BLACKMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson Smith v. Ted Jackson, et al
as 24-11826
Plaintiff:
STEPHENSON LAMAR SMITH
Defendant:
TED JACKSON, OFFICER JONES and OFFICER WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
