Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Molina Santana v. Hott et al
as 1:2023cv01538
Petitioner:
Mr. Gregorio Marcos Molina Santana and Gregorio Marcos Molina Santana
Respondent:
Russell Hott, Attorney General Merrick Garland, Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ortiz v. Gould et al
as 3:2021cv00098
Defendant:
Tyler Nord, Jessica D. White, Ryan J. Younggren and others
Plaintiff:
George Anthony Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tapp v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2021cv00396
Defendant:
Heather Wright, Lorinda Lampkin, Sarah Brown-Foles and others
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gable v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2020cv01519
Defendant:
United States Probation Services, Ashley Pratt, United States Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher W Gable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nabaya v. Aber et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Gabrielle M. Michalak and Jessica D. Aber
Plaintiff:
Shapat Ahdawan Nabaya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2019cv00945
Defendant:
Daniel Q. Sullivan, Jessica D. Stover, Rob Jeffreys and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Stover et al
as 3:2019cv00452
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Daniel Q. Sullivan, Jason C. Hahs and others
Plaintiff:
Julian Bonner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halbesleben v. Akamatsu
as 1:2019cv00138
Respondent:
Shelley Akamatsu
Petitioner:
Jessica D Halbesleben
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tapp et al v. Stover et al
as 3:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Brian A. Tapp and David P Hoffman
Defendant:
Jessica D. Stover, C. Thomas Holt, Daniel Q. Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
