Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Gipson v. Tripp
as 4:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
John Oliver Gipson
Respondent:
Chris Tripp
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felipe Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-12736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FELIPE IGNACIO RIVADENEIRA
Defendant / Appellee:
D. RAY JAMES CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CHRONIC CARE CLINICS, Medical Facility, THE GEO GROUP, INC., A Florida Corporation and others
Arroyo v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Bryant Arroyo
Defendant:
Thomas S. McGinley, Deputy J. Gibson, Robert Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivadeneira v. D. Ray James Correctional Facility et al
as 5:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Mr. T. Johns, D. Ray James Correctional Facility, Dr. Rick Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Felipe Ignacio Rivadeneira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gipson v. Gibbs et al
as 4:2021cv00013
Plaintiff:
John Oliver Gipson
Defendant:
Randy Gibbs and Phillip Eaves
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Werlich
as 3:2020cv00214
Respondent:
T. G. Werlich
Petitioner:
Sheldon John Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Snow v. David Mar, et al
as 18-16577
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN OLIVER SNOW
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID MAR and E.K. MCDANIEL, Warden
Bryant v. United States of America
as 18-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Oliver Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Snow v. Utilization Review Panel et al
as 2:2018cv00100
Defendant:
David A. Mar, R Raranas and Utilization Review Panel
Plaintiff:
John Oliver Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. John Manning
as 17-41147
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN OLIVER MANNING, also known as Fish
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
