Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Perry Singo v. Jonathan Skrmetti
as 23-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PERRY L. SINGO
Defendant / Appellee:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, Attorney General of Tennessee
David Frazier v. Jonathan Skrmetti, et al
as 23-5164
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID TRAVIS FRAZIER
Respondent / Appellee:
JONATHAN THOMAS SKRMETTI, Attorney General for the State of Tennessee and DEWAYNE HENDRIX, Warden
Ellerbe v. Thomas et al
as 1:2022cv02598
Plaintiff:
Craig E. Ellerbe, Jr.
Defendant:
Jonathan Thomas, Kevin Borem, Joseph Perks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
THOMAS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2021cv16164
Petitioner:
JONATHAN THOMAS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RAYMOND ROYCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jose Roberto Cota et al v. County of Orange et al
as 8:2021cv00387
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Campos and Jose Roberto Cota
Defendant:
County of Orange, J. Von Nordheim, Orange County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Stolle
as 7:2019cv00696
Petitioner:
Jonathan Thomas Bradley
Respondent:
K. Stolle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Bisbee et al
as 3:2017cv00677
Defendant:
Connie Bisbee, Tony Corda, Adam Endel and others
Plaintiff:
David Jonathan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2016cv06798
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Jennifer Armstrong and Dept. of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. City of Redmond Oregon et al
as 6:2016cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
City of Redmond Oregon and Redmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Cox et al
as 3:2013cv00508
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Cox, Scott Kahler and others
Plaintiff:
David Jonathan Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
