Cases 1 - 10 of 46
GREGORIO v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
ROMULO GREGORIO
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS, M. EBO, RN., DR. HAGGAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. McWade et al
as 2:2023cv00244
Plaintiff:
Brinteah K Scott
Defendant:
Mr CO McWade, Mrs CO Williams, Mr CO Grizzly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles K. Scott v. The People Of The State Of California
as 5:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Charles K. Scott, Jr. and Parnell K. Curtis
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles K. Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
as 5:2022cv01643
Petitioner:
Charles K. Scott, Jr. and Parnell K. Curtis
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foster v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Billy Jackson, Daniel D Dickerson, Mohamed Touhami and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv07217
Plaintiff:
Christopher K Scott
Defendant:
Thomas Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Scott v. Covello
as 2:2020cv01691
Respondent:
Covello
Petitioner:
Elmar K. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
York v. Scott et al
as 1:2020cv00718
Defendant:
Officer J. Gee, Officer F. Smith and Sgt. K. Scott
Plaintiff:
Herbert Demond York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Gordon v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv20142
Defendant:
G. Morris, Mr. Jones, Ms. Hockaday and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Elmar Scott
as 17-17476
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELMAR K. SCOTT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
