Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 1:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayes v. Coyle et al
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jamaal M. Mayes
Defendant:
Andrew Coyle, Corey Stokes, Kenneth Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burnett v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00947
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kenneth Burnett and Kenneth R Burnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dudley v. Green et al
as 0:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
Dominique Rashan Dudley
Defendant:
Terry Wallace, Corrections Officer Kenneth Burnett, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Green et al
as 0:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Dominique Rashan Dudley
Defendant:
Terry Wallace, Corrections Officer Kenneth Burnett, Jeffrey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Green et al
as 3:2019cv00184
Defendant:
Warden James Green, Corrections Officer Kenneth Burnett, Deputy Warden Terry Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Dominique Rashan Dudley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. IVEY et al
as 5:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CLARK
Defendant:
GEORGE IVEY, JARVIS PRIMUS, CARL LIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Owens et al
as 6:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
Justin Clark
Defendant:
Brian Owens, Stanley Williams, Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Aslam et al
as 2:2009cv00190
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Burnett
Defendant:
M. Aslam, Maria L. Dy and T. Iturrable
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Geoffrey Atwell v. Thomas Lavan, et al
as 08-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEOFFREY WILLARD ATWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, LEE T. BERNARD, II, PATRICIA BLIZZARD and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL, MARK S. SCHWEIKER, SARAH HART and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
