Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Marshall v. Warden of Dade C.I.
as 1:2020cv21762
Defendant:
Warden of Dade C.I.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey et al v. Baker
as 5:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carl Borg, Charles Raymond, Dennis Emerson and others
Defendant:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenneth Marshall v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab & Correct, et al
as 17-3569
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH MARSHALL
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTIONS, GARY MOHR, DOCTOR EDDY and others
Defendant:
MEDICAL RECORDS PERSONNEL, [UNKNOWN] JACKIE, COLLEGIAL REVIEW BOARD and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv04711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kenneth Marshall v. Warden Pickaway Correctional
as 15-3876
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN PICKAWAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Marshall v. Haynes et al
as 1:2015cv01009
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Haynes, Sgt. Richerson and Lt. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Haynes et al
as 1:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Marshall
Defendant:
Officer Haynes, Sgt. Richerson and Lt. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
as 2:2014cv00812
Petitioner:
Kenneth Marshall
Respondent:
Warden, Pickaway Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dashawn Smith, et al v. Zach Scott, et al
as 14-3382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DASHAWN SMITH, CLARENCE D. DICKERSON, CHRISTOPHER REED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACH SCOTT, FRANKLIN COUNTY OHIO, Majors and Deputies, PENNY PERRY and others
Marshall v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Marshall
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Gary Mohr, John R. Kasich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
